just for fun like when kids play doctor or nurse . heck even just an aeriola or the skin under your belly . I also like little personal tours of your daily activity like just showering or making a snack or even shopping for new panties
I feel like that's a definite no, but you know what, I'll think about it. Okay I thought about it, no.
ahhhh , yer so modest and nunlike . that's ok join the convent and secret record your interactions with the head mother who gets to boss you and make you kiss her feet as she commands you to gaze into her wanton eyes .
I appreciate your inquiry though!
ok I see where you are . pretend we are in a domestic dispute , like you refuse to do the dishes or maybe you cooked me only a 4 star meal instead of 5 ...well there are ways for a man to stand up to this female passive aggression:
(11-21-2019, 11:14 PM)Hal Wrote: [ -> ]or maybe you cooked me only a 4 star meal instead of 5
Everybody has their off days!
(11-21-2019, 10:19 PM)Hal Wrote: [ -> ]just for fun like when kids play doctor or nurse . heck even just an aeriola or the skin under your belly . I also like little personal tours of your daily activity like just showering or making a snack or even shopping for new panties
what's an areola? I just want to see her pretty face...naked.
I thought it said "Pirates"...
You do need to unleash them sweater puppies while they're firm and perky. Don't be like them Hollywood has-beens who pose nude at age 40 to try to restart their careers. Ain't nobody wanna see no old, sagging fun bags.
They all did it wrong...
You take all the naked pics when you're young, you squirrel them away to be found at a much later time.
Then you surrender to death.
There's no point in trying to restart a career or even have a career in the first place...
We're all dying too fast for it to matter.
I'm in the business of archival and always have been. Of info, not of naked shit lmao. Well, I mean there is SOME naked shit.
I think the age of selfies and just the digital age of photos in general has made the pictures mean a lot less.
I think it's better to be a sort of obscure person with only a select amount of photos. A few nudes maybe for shock or scandal (posthumously of course), but mostly candid photos and a handful of good purposeful pictures.
yeah blatant nudes are kinda boring , we need to see you in nature trying to mix with the humans
ROFL Guest...
You make my heart go boomity boom.
Posthumous scandals aren't very much fun. The subjects need to be alive for the public to see how they bear the aftermath of being exposed. It must be a Crappening.
Hmmm...
We're not talking about the same thing.
You seem to be talking about something superficial, I'm talking about history.
Not that history can't be incredibly superficial and not that it isn't picked over to preserve things that are useful to one agenda or another...
I am just saying, you and I have vastly disparate interests and see things in a wholly incompatible way.
Although I did use the word "Scandal" so I will grant you that... I should have chosen my words better but in general I think you misunderstood what I'm talking about.
No fault of yours, it is what is. As I said, we are just not on the same wavelength.
I dunno, I've seen a lot of people straight up OPPOSE archiving one's online life...
Photos, screencaps, downloads of important broadcasts (audio OR video), informational texts, one's own writings, I mean just ALL of your internet life/interests compiled...
I've had people flat out tell me they think it's a waste of time, or it's stupid, or there's no reason to, etc.
I just couldn't agree any less. That's like saying grandma never should have put together those family albums because nobody cares about seeing Uncle Dave when he was 5 and nobody cares about seeing your mom's high school picture, or nobody cares about seeing you as a baby 50 years ago.
I dunno, I just think that's really lame, and the idea that what we do now in the digital age is any different than that really makes me shake my head. It's NOT different, it's exactly the same thing, just in another format, and actually it's a whole lot more expansive than your 'family album'... there's a whole lot more encompassed in it than just your life, your information, etc. It's a conglomerate... waste of time? Ha, I think not.
I have my entire life online archived from 2005 onward...
All of it.
And I have never once looked back and thought it was a waste of time, or I should have spent that time doing something else.
My God, hell no.
If I'm going to spend a large part of my life dabbling in the online spheres, I'm going to have it ALL saved so I can show what I learned, what I did/said, what I looked like in those days...
Everything.
And I can make it physical.
I can print it out and hold it.
It's tangible, it's real.
What a grave, terrible thing it would be to spend as much time as I've devoted (and would NEVER take back or change) in the online spheres and not have saved any of it...
I can't even imagine the emptiness of that.
Like it or not, think it's stupid, think it's lame...
I can show you exactly what I've been doing, thinking, feeling and saying for the past 15 years in intricate detail.
I can account for all of it...
And yeah maybe it only makes sense to me, it's one of those "you had to be there" kinda things...
But it's no different than stories shared between a couple people, reminiscing about some shit that only you and some other fucker were there to see, in a room full of people who don't share that memory with you.
It's no different, and I think people who don't save/archive their online lives are making a big mistake.