Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Well I mean...
If you're gonna marry an older dude, Jack is definitely the best case scenario.
Ridiculously good looking, weird, busy...
Traveling a lot so you probably don't even have to see each other all the time.
Sounds ideal. As long as they've been together though, this is about the time to start breaking up, not getting married.
Wonder if she demanded it out of him to make the whole thing worth her time? Seems unlikely they just did it randomly now of all times. I think she's knocked up and he wants to make an honest woman out of her. That's hot.
I guess Jack's wives keep their last names due to already being public figures, but also because they'd be taking Meg's last name which is where he got it.
It was definitely a great choice though, definitely a better name.
Olivia's last name is Markel though and I think I'd be dropping that for "White" if I possibly could.
In the early days people assumed OJ's plan was just to use Jack to try and get famouser.
But over the years it became pretty apparent that even if that had been her plan at some point, it's long been abandoned.
I think the perfect relationship would be you see each other every 6 months or so, maybe for 4 or 5 days at a time...
I'm almost kinda heartwarmed.
You even have a heart????
I have the heart of a man.
LOLOL, holy crap!!!
You make me think maybe I AM right!!!
Here's my hope...
I hope Olivia is TRULY on board with Jack's vision, the legacy, the empire...
He's not in it for HIMSELF, believes in the legacy to be there for OTHER people, those who love music/records, old school shit.
I just hope she truly shares that and will take care of it if anything is left to her.
She's a bit younger than he is, so hopefully if things are left under her control in Jack's absence, she really will take care of it.
And hopefully he protected his wealth and whatnot before he entered into that union/contract.
I dunno if I can watch this because I can hardly even stand how hot Jack White is...
But it's cool to see him do so much promo for his new album(s) because it seems like he doesn't typically do this kinda stuff.
He's got an epic team behind him too, anything they ever do put out is really high quality so I wanna give Jack and his team credit for doing everything right.
The Elvis movie is gonna suck the biggest balls around, and I guarantee this song is the only good thing about it.
TBH, they should have had Jack White play Elvis back in ~2006... huge missed opportunity.
Elvis doesn't need some stupid bio-pic that looks like Rocky Horror Picture Show meets Glee.
54:38 ooohhhohohohoho babeeeeh.
1:13:28 he's a legit rockstar, AF.
1:20:40 he's one of the most talented in this guitar genre, which is the 'emotion-to-sound' players. But he's got his own niche... Jack is like a guitar mockingbird, playing stuff that doesn't typically sound like it should have come from a guitar. So Jack does have the #1 spot here.
Guitar style is as unique as a thumbprint. There are other masters of music who are just as recognizable... Jimi Hendrix. Neal Schon. Neil Young. Mick Mars.
But let's just go ahead and use Mick Mars as an example... he's the greatest shredder/emotion hybrid guitarist, that's MY opinion. Neil Young is the best folk guitarist (Bob Dylan is not a folk artist; try me). Neal Schon, top three all time. Jack White, top 3. Hendrix, top 3. I will tell you who's at the number 1 position, Hendrix.
Jimi Hendrix is the greatest guitarist of all time, at the time of writing, in history as we know it.
Jack can be number 3, because Neal Schon is #2.
Think about the fact that Jimi Hendrix is not really available on YouTube. It's all live. Except for ACTUALLY TWO songs that were so widely used and propagated that the official Jimi Hendrix channel was forced to just go ahead and upload them in the past decade.
Who's the odd one out?
Jimi Hendrix.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZBlqcbpmxY
How in the fuck is THAT the only studio version of Voodoo Child available on YouTube???
Who's got the rights to Jimi's music, some kinda archaic group or something???
FREE JIMI'S MUSIC.
You're keeping him back if he's not on YouTube.
WHO IS HOLDING JIMI'S MUSIC FROM BEING SHARED?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
I mean, for real... what's the strategy there??
Does withholding Jimi's music from places like YouTube somehow help his legacy in the long run?
What's the idea?? I might even agree with it if I knew what it was...
From here, it just looks like Jimi's music is being oppressed.
Repressed.
Limited.
Held back.
Not able to be appreciated by a wider audience.
I just don't see how this is a good approach, or how it's saying anything (making a statement; proving a point; making a stand), or if it's just plain refusal to share, for no particular reason.
I appreciate what you appreciate nice lady
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10