SECTUAL

Full Version: Amber Heard and the Psychiatrist
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
(05-20-2022, 09:18 AM)Terraformer Wrote: [ -> ]Elon Musk confirmed Twitter lies about the amounts of Fake Bots they use on Twitter. A lot of social engineering Bots that Twitter lies about not having

Elon thinks there are more bots on Twitter than Twitter says there are, which is probably true.

But since Twitter has a history of erroneously framing ordinary people as bots because they type too fast or whatever, I'm inclined to believe Twitter doesn't have a clue how to identify bots.
(05-19-2022, 11:30 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: [ -> ]Oh you definitely didn't mislead anybody man... and I gotta be honest, I think the last few days in the court have been confusing and I've heard a few commentators share that opinion too. That's my take on it.

The Johnny Depp female Lawyer is the only one making sense in that whole Johnny Depp Case and we been following Depp's case for years. Win or Lose I like how the female lawyer is demanding answers from Amber Heard for why she lies about hurting Johnny Depp
(05-20-2022, 09:27 AM)Dev Wrote: [ -> ]Elon thinks there are more bots on Twitter than Twitter says there are, which is probably true.

But since Twitter has a history of erroneously framing ordinary people as bots because they type too fast or whatever, I'm inclined to believe Twitter doesn't have a clue how to identify bots.

I think they do know otherwise they wouldn't be so much more Bolshevik Bots than rightwing Bots.
Yeah, they're definitely more prone to accuse conservatives of being bots than progressives.
(05-20-2022, 09:31 AM)Dev Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, they're definitely more prone to accuse conservatives of being bots than progressives.

Its possible that all Bolsheviks are Bots. I decline to label Bolsheviks as "Progressives" because they Anti-Intellectuals not reformers.
I'm gonna try to break this down.

First of all, working on the Unix kernel is totally irrelevant to using Twitter search APIs, as are writing mainframe software or an e-mail reader. Any person who knows how to code but otherwise has no formal computer science education can use the APIs.

The witness seems to be asserting that:

(1) One or more defamatory articles about Amber appeared in the press;

(2) Some number of tweets appeared that directly referenced those articles;

(3) Millions of people posted hashtags critical of Amber or supportive of Johnny.

Therefore, the millions of people who posted the hashtags must have read those articles.

I didn't catch whether it was actually millions of people posting the hashtags or some lesser number of people spamming Twitter with the hashtags to boost them. First of all, how many people are really invested enough in this case to bother? Secondly, most people on social media only read the headline of an article without reading the whole thing. The witness couldn't say where in the articles the alleged defamatory remarks appeared. The online press have a habit of burying dubious statements near the bottom of a long article, knowing most people won't read that far.

It seems most likely that a relatively small number of people are so emotionally invested in this issue that they spammed the hashtags to inflate their rankings.

But never mind all that. To prove that Johnny defamed Amber, they have to show defamatory statements made by Johnny himself. They also have to show that Johnny's statements harmed Amber in some way, such as causing lost income or damaging her reputation.
Watching it again with the sound off. Something seemed to shift hard, and I still don't know quite what it was. Johnny looked super stressed out at first, and Amber kept looking at him like "yeah, bitch", and yet the media forensics guy ended up seeming fairly harmless.

Since I very rarely have these kinds of lucid observations of people's energy state -- and when I do they've always been accurate -- I can only surmise that this guy represents something to Johnny and Amber that we aren't seeing. It's possible that he was recommended by Elon, and Johnny knew this, and was threatened because he wasn't sure what to expect, and Amber merely fed off that moment. Or... maybe I am overdue to be totally wrong on reading the mood of a room. I don't think so. Something was definitely going on, and it's something that is behind the scenes.

On the surface, he's just a social media forensics dude that only opines on math/data. But listen to his resume. Clearly he's not "just a social media forensics dude". He is "merely serving" as one for this context. He made it clear that he's been hired for this work 100's of times, but that it is his first court testimony. Which means he is NOT a professional witness. Johnny's lawyer went to lengths to make this very clear to the jury. I'm not sure why. I would think that would endear him to the Jury. So that means it was part 1 of something not executed yet by Johnny's team, imo. A chess move. Why would THIS be his first testimony? Why wouldn't Amber's team hire someone with years or even decades of court experience? Because he was 'brought in' from out of the loop of Amber's legal team. He was brought in by Amber herself. Total curveball that, for now, seems strangely innocuous. 

In short: the degree to which he was ineffectual did not add up with Amber's defiant energy and Johnny's stress energy.
Johnny didn't appear stressed out to me while the forensics guy was testifying. I hope his lawyers have a witness who can pick him apart the way I tried to, only better.
(05-20-2022, 10:59 AM)Atma Wrote: [ -> ]I can only surmise that this guy represents something to Johnny and Amber that we aren't seeing.

In the eyes of the layman, the witness is a bona fide IT expert. Non-technical people are prone to imagine all kinds of magical things about computers and networks and the people who work on them. So maybe that's it. Amber thinks this neckbeard's testimony is some kind of silver bullet, and Johnny, not knowing any better, fears she may be right.


All the crying in these testimonies is just weird and stupid.
People in the comments are saying the bruises on Amber's face were consistent with botox bruising and she's constantly biting her lips.


I can't believe that the title of this video just references the "That's convenient" comment, when Vasquez and Heard are having it out over precise details about how Johnny "held her down by the neck and assaulted her with a bottle". The way Vasquez leads Amber into painting herself into a corner is scary-good.
Vasquez kind of loses her cool a little at the end, but that can be the bane of handling multiple unwieldy physical documents. She deserves a Tom Cruise Minority Report holographic touch screen and a sexy futuristic black leather outfit.
(05-20-2022, 09:56 PM)Atma Wrote: [ -> ]a sexy futuristic black leather outfit.

Drool
(05-20-2022, 10:13 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: [ -> ]Drool

IKR?


Ohyeah
(05-21-2022, 01:34 AM)Chatwoman Wrote: [ -> ]

Ohyeah

This Amber Heard Trial would be unbearable to listen to without Johnny Depp's Lawyer Camille Vasquez. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST3BctjHdDU
You know, it's like this...

Romantic relationships have that 'honeymoon' phase where they're all at least "okay"...

Usually they're even "good" and there's a high that you get from it, that's what baits people into continued involvement.

But once that fades...

The relationship falls on a spectrum between "meh" and "hellish"...

There isn't a "good" relationship that just STAYS that way.

I think Johnny and Amber felt some kinda whirlwind attraction at first, the honeymoon period was intense...

Then their toxicass shitheap of a relationship became a total mess and they were too entangled together in karma to abandon it when they should have.


This is why everyone loves Johnny Depp.


Sounds like this guy knows what he's talking about.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20