SECTUAL

(03-09-2018, 11:43 PM)Fungus Maximus Wrote: [ -> ]You make sense dude, but I cooked meth once 25 years ago, its bad shit.

*feigns surprise*

Oh! Did you! Really! Fungus...

(03-09-2018, 11:41 PM)Trixmegistus Wrote: [ -> ]I do not validate or entertain any type of lack of common sense...

You start giving dumbfuck notions any type of actual thought power, and you make a heinous mistake that leads to the mentally crippled world of overly PC culture that we see today.

I evaluate things according to the evidence presented by observation, and arrive at conclusions by analysis of the evidence. When I don't see evidence of common sense, I conclude (not assume) it doesn't exist. I'm always open to the possibility that the locals may someday change my mind. I'm just not pinning my hopes on it at this point.

If we're honest with ourselves, we recognize common sense as one of those intangibles that defies precise definition. It's like when a woman rejects a potential lover because "there's no chemistry." She knows what she means, but she can't objectively quantify it. Therefore, it may not even be possible to agree on a definition of common sense.

Also, I reject any conflation of common sense with the kind of faux mind-reading typical of codependent personalities -- presuming to know what someone is thinking or the reasoning behind their actions without asking them. On the other hand, I do believe it's possible to infer someone's motives from the outcome of their actions over a long period of time. For example, if the actions of the deep state over several decades consistently produce results that suggest they're pushing a certain agenda, I can accept that as evidence of ulterior motives.

God dang I love the way you use your words baby.

(03-09-2018, 11:44 PM)Trixmegistus Wrote: [ -> ]*feigns surprise*

Oh! Did you! Really! Fungus...

Yes!

(03-10-2018, 12:04 AM)Trixmegistus Wrote: [ -> ]God dang I love the way you use your words baby.

But do you get what I'm saying? Being a good writer is useless if it doesn't adequately convey one's thoughts.

(03-09-2018, 11:44 PM)Crille Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah I facepalm every time I see someone like Neil deGrasse Tyson go into arguments against flat earth like... Why you even bothering man?

He bothers because his handlers are becoming frightened of the legions learning they have been lied to for 500 years . Look we have a scientific establishment staying very silent about and perpetuating the giant lies of 9/11 ... thats what turned me on to flat earth and flat women

(03-10-2018, 12:15 AM)lulwut Wrote: [ -> ]But do you get what I'm saying? Being a good writer is useless if it doesn't adequately convey one's thoughts.

I knew you'd think the haste of my reply would indicate I hadn't truly read your post...

But the truth is darlin'...

I really am that fast, I really am that good, I really am that smart, and I really am that easily aroused.

(03-10-2018, 12:16 AM)Leo Wrote: [ -> ]thats what turned me on to flat women

Thank God!

(03-10-2018, 12:16 AM)Leo Wrote: [ -> ]He bothers because his handlers are becoming frightened of the legions learning they have been lied to for 500 years . Look we have a scientific establishment staying very silent about and perpetuating the giant lies of 9/11 ... thats what turned me on to flat earth and flat women

How does the establishment lying about 9/11 confirm the flat earth theory? I can't see the connection.

(03-10-2018, 12:27 AM)Trixmegistus Wrote: [ -> ]I knew you'd think the haste of my reply would indicate I hadn't truly read your post...

But the truth is darlin'...

I really am that fast, I really am that good, I really am that smart, and I really am that easily aroused.

It wasn't the haste of your reply, but the fact that it didn't address any of my points. I'm glad it turned you on, but that wasn't really the reason I typed all of that. lol

I did have some thoughts about your post, but they were so off topic and unrelated to what you were talking about...

And in that way, voicing them would have been pointless because from your perspective and the perspective of our readers, they would have had absolutely nothing to do with the points you made.

Therefore my lack of response to any of the points was efficient.

(03-10-2018, 12:34 AM)Trixmegistus Wrote: [ -> ]I did have some thoughts about your post, but they were so off topic and unrelated to what you were talking about...

And in that way, voicing them would have been pointless because from your perspective and the perspective of our readers, they would have had absolutely nothing to do with the points you made.

Therefore my lack of response to any of the points was efficient.

WOW!

Voicing your thoughts is never pointless. And damn any frivolous readers who won't find them engaging. If you reach one person, then your time has been well spent.

I like Fungi because it's so easy to make his head spin.

I've always thought intelligent men were the most attractive but honestly...

I'm starting to think dumb might be the way to go.

Besides, Fungi has the smarts where it matters...

He's got an innate and universal intelligence.

It makes Mama Trixie's honeyhole drip a lil bit.

(03-10-2018, 12:37 AM)lulwut Wrote: [ -> ]Voicing your thoughts is never pointless. And damn any frivolous readers who won't find them engaging. If you reach one person, then your time has been well spent.

Unless you suck anus that is,,,,,,