The Nephilim, the giants of genesis ch 6. The book of Enoch talks in more depth. Steve Quayle is a good resource. Or whatever. I like the theory that devils tower in Wyoming I thing is an ancient giant tree stump. Kinda cool if you like that stuff.
(06-19-2018, 01:12 PM)Dsox Wrote: [ -> ]I like the theory that devils tower in Wyoming I thing is an ancient giant tree stump. Kinda cool if you like that stuff.
Yeah that one got my rocks off too...
http://www.sectual.com/thread-215.html
(08-07-2016, 07:06 PM)Trix Wrote: [ -> ]
That's cuz they were ALL giants at one time.
That's what I'm saying...
We were ALL giants.
http://www.sectual.com/thread-1743.html
(04-16-2017, 07:00 PM)Trix Wrote: [ -> ]
They are trying to insist that the giant humans were around with the "regular" sized humans...
And I'd have to assert that the leftover giants were probably just survivors of the cataclysm.
Rather than being 'visitors' from anywhere else.
There were fewer humans and they were giants...
Now there are more humans and we're smaller.
It's all cyclical. Tons of clones running around right now.
Lil clones. Not the big original versions.
Sigh... This is going to get messy man
>It's long been my theory that every time there's a global cataclysm that causes a mass extinction event, all of the lifeforms get smaller.
only after expansion events, i reckon. even if survivors of a cataclysm produce offspring whose growth is stunted by lack of sufficient food, they can produce full size offspring when the food is back. must have been pretty hard on giants that survived an expansion event.
i fully agree with the conclusion of some of those buttes being giant silicon based trees from a previous era. what a sight those must have been to behold! have you seen the similar research about mud fossils and giants?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8v44qr...UN_XlUMpew
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXYJURt...bcg/videos
i am quite familiar with pareidolia, and will admit that some of what they cover is probably just that, but some of the stuff they talk about... it really seems to be mineralized remains of super giants. hundreds of meters tall type of giants. giants of such stature that they could probably not healthily exist with our current gravity.
the mushroom in the still is dead on imo. you can clearly see the ring over the stipe. the true history of this planet is much more similar to the lord of the rings mythos than most think.
Alright that's it.
That's fucking it.
I'm mindblown.
Oh. My. God, they're fucking mushrooms.
Think about it, WHY COULDN'T THEY BE?
Kind of like the "pillars of salt" story in the Bible...
They could have been preserved like that in a FLASH.
None of the explanations for those kind of formations have EVER made sense to me.
What is with us and fucking mushrooms
That post is amazeballs, btw fuck yeah dude or lady, fuck if I can tell which though, no offense.
But how big was the planet?
This is heavy shit for a Tuesday
https://www.livescience.com/110-presto-i...d-lab.html
Presto! Instant Petrified Wood Created in Lab
the millions of years bullshit always struck me as odd. so you're tryin to tell me that conditions remained ideal for this process for millions of years? seriously? everywhere i've ever been has been in a constant state of change. my travels have been limited, but i know other parts of the world in similar lattitudes follow similar patterns. maybe if the planet wasn't titled and the seasons not a thing, but that hasn't been the case for at least 12,500+ years.
(06-19-2018, 08:26 PM)Dreamz Wrote: [ -> ]That post is amazeballs, btw fuck yeah dude or lady, fuck if I can tell which though, no offense.
i sexually identify as an attack helicopter, but yeah i'm a dude.
(06-19-2018, 08:29 PM)Dreamz Wrote: [ -> ]But how big was the planet?
This is heavy shit for a Tuesday
it's commonly known that if you take all the continents and squish them together against the atlantic ocean, they all fit together nearly as well as a machined jigsaw puzzle. what most are not told is that if you shrink the planet size, the other side does the same exact thing. i don't remember off hand what size that made the planet, but that's how it was.
also, i do not believe that these expansions take place over millions of years. i believe they can occur over a period of decades or years... perhaps even as short as a week.
We need to get you on Joe Rogan
one of the issues i see is that they gauge a material's age based on atomic decay. they presume that the rate of atomic decay is a constant. it is not.
https://physicsworld.com/a/do-solar-neut...-on-earth/
[there are other links to find as well, if you search for variable atomic decay rate. most will have a smattering of `scientists` poopooing the notion, but that is due to the dogmatic state in which science finds itself. gotta keep that funding flowing!]
solar emissions are variable. solar emissions guide planetary evolution. there are events in which the sun's output changes drastically for a period of time, and the effects on the planets are great. these are our mass extinction events and expansion events. it is my feeling that we are on the cusp of one of these, or another type of event in this class. these solar events affect DNA as well, not just atoms.
rogan seems like a pretty cool dude, i'd definitely smoke with him and have a chat. i wouldn't be that comfortable doing some sort of widely distributed media... i am a student sharing my notes, such broadcasts should be more for masters, in my opinion. i don't have a ton of my own original work, i'm just collating and interpreting the work of dozens of others through time.
Seriously though, thanks for the links and videos. Very interested in this
I agree about the dating, it makes no sense and when you compare every science days verse ancient recorded history says it gets dicey. Personally, I feel the ancients had no reason to work so hard to tell us fairy tales