Anti-Intellectuals is a term that refers to a group of people that focus on imposing their own false perceptions on all people in daily conversations. 

Anti-Intellectuals use different words to label things , words that normally would convey meaning are used to describe the opposite of what they mean. For example Anti-Intellectuals label themselves as Progressives yet they are opposed to any reforms that have increments in efficiency, prosperity and individual freedoms.

The reason USA Right Wingers feel so compelled to use the language of Anti-Intellectuals is because the USA Right Wingers lack private ownership no matter how rich a USA Right Winger maybe they forego their Private property rights and dont seek to add onto the individual freedoms they may have earned according to the law. This is a phenomenon that only happens among USA Right Wingers because they forego Nobility in a failed attempt to give equity to all individuals regardless of their status in social hierarchy. 

An attempt at removing USA Nobility may have worked if they based their aspirations in merits and excellence rewarding good performance to those deserving of victory. aspiring for excelleasnce and rasewarding good performance of those deserving of nmnmnmn

Terraformer, you sound smart...

The problem with a hereditary nobility is that they usually prove to be anything but a meritocracy. You may get the occasional good leader in a bloodline, but you'll more often get a petty tyrant. Because of our history of being a former British colony ruled from afar by a tyrannical king and noble class, the idea of such exalted classes is repugnant to the American egalitarian ethos, and was scrupulously avoided from the outset. The ruling hierarchy of the noble classes was replaced by one of democratically elected classes at all levels of government, and gradually extended by private economic development to include business tycoons, celebrities, and other groups deemed worthy at various phases of America's social evolution. Obviously, the worthiness of some of these groups should be re-examined in hindsight.

The reason right-wingers adopt the language of so-called liberals or progressives is that they fear being shamed or "cancelled" for voicing opinions that may be regarded as bigoted. Insofar as adopting the language of the opposition is a tacit endorsement of the opposing ideology, the right continually allows the left to frame the public conversation.

What you say about exercising one's right to land ownership is true. Private property is the bedrock of individual liberty, as well the foundation of conservatism as developed by Edmund Burke and others, and as we know it today. Right-wingers need to educate themselves about the roots and fundamental principles of conservatism, rather than waste their energy reacting to whatever madness the left throws out there from day to day - and it's always gonna be something. By dancing like puppets to the left wing's tune, right-wingers make of themselves the very caricatures of conservatism that the left has drawn.

(05-20-2022, 10:11 PM)Dev Wrote: The problem with a hereditary nobility is that they usually prove to be anything but a meritocracy. You may get the occasional good leader in a bloodline, but you'll more often get a petty tyrant. Because of our history of being a former British colony ruled from afar by a tyrannical king and noble class, the idea of such exalted classes is repugnant to the American egalitarian ethos, and was scrupulously avoided from the outset. The ruling hierarchy of the noble classes was replaced by one of democratically elected classes at all levels of government, and gradually extended by private economic development to include business tycoons, celebrities, and other groups deemed worthy at various phases of America's social evolution. Obviously, the worthiness of some of these groups should be re-examined in hindsight.

The reason right-wingers adopt the language of so-called liberals or progressives is that they fear being shamed or "cancelled" for voicing opinions that may be regarded as bigoted. Insofar as adopting the language of the opposition is a tacit endorsement of the opposing ideology, the right continually allows the left to frame the public conversation.

What you say about exercising one's right to land ownership is true. Private property is the bedrock of individual liberty, as well the foundation of conservatism as developed by Edmund Burke and others, and as we know it today. Right-wingers need to educate themselves about the roots and fundamental principles of conservatism, rather than waste their energy reacting to whatever madness the left throws out there from day to day - and it's always gonna be something. By dancing like puppets to the left wing's tune, right-wingers make of themselves the very caricatures of conservatism that the left has drawn.

Hereditary Nobility is easily solved by Chieftainship familial bonds.  In Uganda my TribesMen have many children so that each generation will have Clan Elders from whom Clan Elders have a Clan Head and a Village Chief chosen among them, Sometimes we elect a Village Chief outside the Clan but Clan Head always has to be a Blood Relative. We kept these traditions since 1600BC when we settled in Uganda. In my Ugandan Tribe we have Clans, Clan Elders, family Heirs and Clan members. My father and uncles were to be made the next generation of Clan Elders after my Grandfather who was a Village Chief at the time passed away unfortunately my father did not get the chance to fulfil his role as a Clan Elder because he died some years after before his uncle (my Grandfather's younger brother) did & neither did my Uncles because they passed too. This means roles of Clan Elders falls to my Generation, my father and Uncles were boomers but my cousins and I are Millenials, my older cousins are Genz . We already chosen our Family Heirs now our Clan Elders are to be chosen among myself and my many cousins.

Are the Chiefs and Elders elected by the whole clan or village?

(05-20-2022, 10:51 PM)Dev Wrote: Are the Chiefs and Elders elected by the whole clan or village?

By the whole Clan if they are available and if necessary our King appoints them .

"He knew about wilderness and what-have-you. I knew nothing. I had a cat."

Here's a well-made documentary about an endearing couple who experienced trouble in their gated community and moved out to the sticks. It points up the importance of land ownership.

(05-20-2022, 07:46 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: Terraformer, you sound smart...

Thank you. I get even smarter when among smart friends like you, Chatwoman and Dev

(05-20-2022, 11:01 PM)Terraformer Wrote: By the whole Clan if they are available and if necessary our King appoints them .

This sounds like a hybrid hereditary / democratic solution.

America as a nation is too large to have a national government based on familial ties. Unless you want a Bush dynasty or a Clinton dynasty, I mean. You may as well have an emperor.

Most matters could be handled at the family or village level if the Federal and state governments would butt out.

@Terraformer, what are you studying at university, if I may ask?

(05-20-2022, 11:12 PM)Dev Wrote: This sounds like a hybrid hereditary / democratic solution.

America as a nation is too large to have a national government based on familial ties. Unless you want a Bush dynasty or a Clinton dynasty, I mean. You may as well have an emperor.

Most matters could be handled at the family or village level if the Federal and state governments would butt out.

You already have this hybrid hereditary/democratic solution among your large Nuclear families with many children, your Gated Communities, your Extended families, your White Enclaves, your Peasants and your Villages. It doesn't matter how Tyrant your Federal Governments are as long as all your Kinsmen stands with you if that means you all go to jail so be it you face whatever dangers that come as family owners .  The original family owners were the Chieftess and Chiefs of hunting bands.  Among the Brit Celts you have stories of a Chieftess who commanded War Chiefs and War Chieftains against Roman Legions

(05-20-2022, 11:14 PM)Dev Wrote: @Terraformer, what are you studying at university, if I may ask?

Am studying Undergraduate Biology.

(05-20-2022, 11:23 PM)Terraformer Wrote: Among the Brit Celts you have stories of a Chieftess who commanded War Chiefs and War Chieftains against Roman Legions

Boudica.

https://www.biographyonline.net/royalty/boudica.html

(05-20-2022, 11:31 PM)Dev Wrote: Boudica.

https://www.biographyonline.net/royalty/boudica.html

I have a theory that women are better leaders when its familial roles than when they elected leaders. Am not sure how Le Pen would have been as a leader but I dont think Margaret Thatcher and Angela Merkel were exceptional compared to  Chieftess Boudica , Russian Empress Catherine and Olga the Russian Viking Saint along with many other Oracles, Witches, Priestesses, Shield maidens, Duchess, Princesses, Queens, family heiresses and Chieftesses .

Le Pen would've been about as effective as any other politician in a multi-partisan democracy, I suppose. Perhaps she would've boosted French national pride a bit.

(05-20-2022, 06:30 PM)Terraformer Wrote: Anti-Intellectuals is a term that refers to a group of people that focus on imposing their own false perceptions on all people in daily conversations. 

Anti-Intellectuals use different words to label things , words that normally would convey meaning are used to describe the opposite of what they mean. For example Anti-Intellectuals label themselves as Progressives yet they are opposed to any reforms that have increments in efficiency, prosperity and individual freedoms.

The reason USA Right Wingers feel so compelled to use the language of Anti-Intellectuals is because the USA Right Wingers lack private ownership no matter how rich a USA Right Winger maybe they forego their Private property rights and dont seek to add onto the individual freedoms they may have earned according to the law. This is a phenomenon that only happens among USA Right Wingers because they forego Nobility in a failed attempt to give equity to all individuals regardless of their status in social hierarchy. 

An attempt at removing USA Nobility may have worked if they based their aspirations in merits and excellence rewarding good performance to those deserving of victory. aspiring for excelleasnce and rasewarding good performance of those deserving of nmnmnmn

Autocratic Democracy is the best form of democracy for Private Property Owners. Autocratic Democracy for Private Property owners is a system of democracy where one Person as the sole owner makes decisions about what actions people should take on his or her private property. If there is more than 1 sole owner then the decision is still made by those owners without including their other members

(05-20-2022, 11:12 PM)Dev Wrote: This sounds like a hybrid hereditary / democratic solution.

America as a nation is too large to have a national government based on familial ties. Unless you want a Bush dynasty or a Clinton dynasty, I mean. You may as well have an emperor.

Most matters could be handled at the family or village level if the Federal and state governments would butt out.

I rather a Kennedy family dynasty or a Donald J Trump family dynasty as opposed to the other two. USA has this Individualist Mythology where a single lone person saves the day like the Lone Wolf, Kyle Rittenhouse for example.

(05-23-2022, 06:31 AM)Terraformer Wrote: I rather a Kennedy family dynasty or a Donald J Trump family dynasty as opposed to the other two. USA has this Individualist Mythology where a single lone person saves the day like Kyle Rittenhouse for example.

USA Authorities/Corporations dont want USA Freedonians to gather up self reliance separate from USA Govt which is why USA Urbanites are no longer Industrious people with craftmanship and apprentices. Todays USA Urbanites (with USA manufacturing outsourced to China) are now only consumerists  very much unlike the self reliant Rural peoples today or the "innovative Industrious Urbanite people of the 1920s who crafted the Electrical Grid."

(05-23-2022, 06:37 AM)Terraformer Wrote: USA Authorities/Corporations dont want USA Freedonians to gather up self reliance separate from USA Govt which is why USA Urbanites are no longer Industrious people with craftmanship and apprentices. Todays USA Urbanites (with USA manufacturing outsourced to China) are now only consumerists  very much unlike the self reliant Rural peoples today or the "innovative Industrious Urbanite people of the 1920s who crafted the Electrical Grid."

Family Private Property owners and Collective Ownership in an Autocratic Democracy with Individual bodily Autonomy is the only solution to minimizing USA Govt Crimes or Foreign Elite Monopoly unlike Individualism among lone Private Property Owners without a Social Family Hierarchy. The Latin Motto "e pluribus unum" meaning the many unite.

(05-23-2022, 06:31 AM)Terraformer Wrote: I rather a Kennedy family dynasty or a Donald J Trump family dynasty as opposed to the other two. USA has this Individualist Mythology where a single lone person saves the day like the Lone Wolf, Kyle Rittenhouse for example.

Private Property Ownership, Collective Ownership, Family Legacy and Family Private Ownership is better than Individualism where everyone remains a Loner like Kyle Rittenhouse was before Kyle was attacked by many Jew Thugs & then later by  Jew Theocrats. Even the Jew Theocrats in ADL attacked Kyle Rittenhouse