04-26-2020, 01:54 PM
I've always had a soft spot for goth girls too.
Back in the 90s, goth chicks didn't have tattoos... well, I mean, for the MOST part. The whole idea was to be pale and the whole idea was to play up the paleness, so anything that was uncovered was supposed to be starkly pale almost like a doll.
Tattoos are literally the opposite of that. I think it's an unfortunate pairing, I really do.
I agree with this one, but for me it's about the chest in general. The chest is such an important part of female loveliness. This has nothing to do with boobs themselves, really. The clavicle area is really a source of loveliness on a good looking woman, you know what I'm talking about.
I think tattoos on the chest area should be totally avoided. But I will say that I've known a couple chicks who had a SMALL tattoo on the chest, and I thought it was cool as fuck. Largely it depends on the woman. But any big piece on the chest?? I would have to vote strictly no.
Stomach tattoos are a travesty on anyone.
First of all, tattoos need to be kept small. That's the bottom line. But I used to have this template I made that I would draw on my thigh every now and then, it was a pair of cat eyes. Super random, but I thought it was cute and fun, and I liked how it looked. I think having a tattoo on only one leg is striking and if you were going to do it, you shouldn't look to balance it out with something on the other leg. I see a lot of people do that. The idea of tattoos is to be striking. If you put one on the other leg, all emphasis is taken away from the original one.
And this applies to tattoos no matter where they are. They're meant to stand out and make a statement... if there are too many, they get lost in the noise and you can't focus on any of them.
Psht, never.
All that said, I think tattoos are a bad idea in general and I explain why here...
https://www.sectual.com/thread-4515-post...l#pid34332
Back in the 90s, goth chicks didn't have tattoos... well, I mean, for the MOST part. The whole idea was to be pale and the whole idea was to play up the paleness, so anything that was uncovered was supposed to be starkly pale almost like a doll.
Tattoos are literally the opposite of that. I think it's an unfortunate pairing, I really do.
(04-26-2020, 01:36 PM)somethingelseishere Wrote: 1) Titties.
I agree with this one, but for me it's about the chest in general. The chest is such an important part of female loveliness. This has nothing to do with boobs themselves, really. The clavicle area is really a source of loveliness on a good looking woman, you know what I'm talking about.
I think tattoos on the chest area should be totally avoided. But I will say that I've known a couple chicks who had a SMALL tattoo on the chest, and I thought it was cool as fuck. Largely it depends on the woman. But any big piece on the chest?? I would have to vote strictly no.
(04-26-2020, 01:36 PM)somethingelseishere Wrote: 2) The Tummy.
Stomach tattoos are a travesty on anyone.
(04-26-2020, 01:36 PM)somethingelseishere Wrote: 3) Them THIGHS!
First of all, tattoos need to be kept small. That's the bottom line. But I used to have this template I made that I would draw on my thigh every now and then, it was a pair of cat eyes. Super random, but I thought it was cute and fun, and I liked how it looked. I think having a tattoo on only one leg is striking and if you were going to do it, you shouldn't look to balance it out with something on the other leg. I see a lot of people do that. The idea of tattoos is to be striking. If you put one on the other leg, all emphasis is taken away from the original one.
And this applies to tattoos no matter where they are. They're meant to stand out and make a statement... if there are too many, they get lost in the noise and you can't focus on any of them.
(04-26-2020, 01:36 PM)somethingelseishere Wrote: 4) The Ass.
Psht, never.
All that said, I think tattoos are a bad idea in general and I explain why here...
https://www.sectual.com/thread-4515-post...l#pid34332
(12-20-2017, 01:12 AM)Mister Obvious Wrote: If you get a tattoo of Jane's name on your arm, you can basically never exist in any timeline where Jane doesn't exist.
So when Jane dumps you and assfucks your heart, breaks it into 1000 shattered pieces and lights it on fire and then shits on the roasted bits of your heart...
You're trapped in the timelines where Jane existed.
Rather than being able to jump timelines to where the bitch didn't even exist and you were never even together, you're stuck in timelines where Jane and you have a past.
Bad fucking idea.
Apply that logic to anything you might get a tattoo about.
It's restrictive in a whole lot of ways.
