04-11-2022, 03:08 AM
Women aren't even worth considering in this debate, their reproductive viability doesn't even last long enough for them to be considered the problem. They literally aren't able to reproduce past a certain age. It's men who are able to do that...
Therefore, lifelong male reproductive capability is the elephant in the room.
The defects in the offspring of an older female are obvious, and physical... higher risks of retardation etc. This makes sense because the egg is the actual physical matter that forms the human.
What is the fatal error in the far less cohesive material (sperm) that the older male contributes to reproduction?
It's extremely serious and crucial to understand this.
Older females breed physical defects. Older men breed psychological defects that give the world serial killers, violent criminals, and all manner of other dangerous people.
Therefore, lifelong male reproductive capability is the elephant in the room.
The defects in the offspring of an older female are obvious, and physical... higher risks of retardation etc. This makes sense because the egg is the actual physical matter that forms the human.
What is the fatal error in the far less cohesive material (sperm) that the older male contributes to reproduction?
It's extremely serious and crucial to understand this.
Older females breed physical defects. Older men breed psychological defects that give the world serial killers, violent criminals, and all manner of other dangerous people.
