05-03-2022, 11:47 AM
Oh my god, she's ruling in Johnny's favor and Johnny is hugging his lawyer. I am overwhelmed.
But wait... she can't complete her ruling because she's missing evidence.
Okay, so there are three claims the defense is asking her to strike. She has refused to strike two of them, which means Johnny is getting his way on two of the three counts. On the third (technically the first of three; so the first) she has said she doesn't have enough evidence, and has asked that they take another break.
But oh my god, it's practically done now. Her wording... her wording was so utterly damning of Amber, yet so professional and to the point.
I will transcribe it here:
"I have reviewed all of the evidence submitted in this matter.
As to the second and third alleged defamatory statements, and the motion to strike at this juncture:
I view the evidence in light to be most favorable to the plaintiff (BOOOOM)
and reasonable inferences from the evidence to the plaintiff" (BOOOOM)
She says something to the effect that if new evidence is submitted to the contrary, then the jury can weigh that, but that
"the jury could weigh that the statements were:
• made by the defendant
• about the plaintiff
• that the statement was published
• THAT THE STATEMENT IS FALSE
• THAT THE DEFENDANT MADE THE STATEMENT KNOWING IT WAS FALSE
• THAT THE DEFENDANT MADE IT SO RECKLESSLY, AS TO AMOUNT TO DISREGARD FOR THE TRUTH - fucking END QUOTE.
But wait... she can't complete her ruling because she's missing evidence.
Okay, so there are three claims the defense is asking her to strike. She has refused to strike two of them, which means Johnny is getting his way on two of the three counts. On the third (technically the first of three; so the first) she has said she doesn't have enough evidence, and has asked that they take another break.
But oh my god, it's practically done now. Her wording... her wording was so utterly damning of Amber, yet so professional and to the point.
I will transcribe it here:
"I have reviewed all of the evidence submitted in this matter.
As to the second and third alleged defamatory statements, and the motion to strike at this juncture:
I view the evidence in light to be most favorable to the plaintiff (BOOOOM)
and reasonable inferences from the evidence to the plaintiff" (BOOOOM)
She says something to the effect that if new evidence is submitted to the contrary, then the jury can weigh that, but that
"the jury could weigh that the statements were:
• made by the defendant
• about the plaintiff
• that the statement was published
• THAT THE STATEMENT IS FALSE
• THAT THE DEFENDANT MADE THE STATEMENT KNOWING IT WAS FALSE
• THAT THE DEFENDANT MADE IT SO RECKLESSLY, AS TO AMOUNT TO DISREGARD FOR THE TRUTH - fucking END QUOTE.









