07-03-2022, 04:55 PM
One woman's comment in particular said that she was attending a group session that she hadn't signed up for, was on a whim and basically her name wasn't on any list... she said that he mostly talked to people in the front row but at one point he looked up at her and 'described her grandmother' and then said some shit he couldn't have possibly known about, you couldn't find on Google/Facebook, was super personal, etc.
What we need in order to determine his legitimacy is a total anon who provides no information whatsoever, who he doesn't know about beforehand (thus research), and he needs to share something personal, specific and undeniable.
According the various comments, he's already done this with people, before he was ever well known... but those comments don't really go into specifics so it's hard to know if he's ever had a proper litmus test essentially.
I think this guy is promising in terms of legitimacy, but dunno if proof of ability will ever be demonstrated or made available.
What we need in order to determine his legitimacy is a total anon who provides no information whatsoever, who he doesn't know about beforehand (thus research), and he needs to share something personal, specific and undeniable.
According the various comments, he's already done this with people, before he was ever well known... but those comments don't really go into specifics so it's hard to know if he's ever had a proper litmus test essentially.
I think this guy is promising in terms of legitimacy, but dunno if proof of ability will ever be demonstrated or made available.
