Disclosure & Attention Diversion: What are we missing, and what is the real story?
Seriously, though... 

If the idea is to get this whistleblower's story out there, why would you splice this in half to release a "part 2" a full week later? There are several podcasts on this channel more than twice the length of part 1. 

So, what's the reason? Just for drama's sake? Entertainment? Aren't we supposed to be taking this whistleblower's wellbeing seriously? And we're just gonna shelve "part 2" til 7 days from now, now that the world knows what he's willing to talk about? That's a bit odd, no?
Reply


Please note that new posts in this forum must be approved by a moderator before becoming visible.
[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Messages In This Thread
RE: Disclosure & Attention Diversion: What are we missing, and what is the real story? - by Luscious Atari - Yesterday, 09:12 PM












Disclaimer | Terms Of Service | Privacy Policy