12-29-2018, 06:39 PM
I've theorized about this being related to "Project Blue Beam" before.
If they ever pull some kind of widescale stunt like that, I think it would be likely that they shut down the internet during that timeframe.
This is because if the internet were up during the instance, far fewer people would see it... and the people who did see it would be theorizing and sharing info right off the bat, allowing the possibility of really putting the pieces together and getting to the bottom of what's really going on.
If the internet were down, everyone would have to witness the event without being able to share/discuss it with a global mind... and once the internet came back up, the USEFUL information about the incident would be A LOT LESS, and the sensationalized info would far outweigh it.
24 hours after events, the discussion usually becomes pretty useless... the first 24 hours is when the most useful, truthful, non-sensationalized info is distributed/discussed.
Just some thoughts.
If they ever pull some kind of widescale stunt like that, I think it would be likely that they shut down the internet during that timeframe.
This is because if the internet were up during the instance, far fewer people would see it... and the people who did see it would be theorizing and sharing info right off the bat, allowing the possibility of really putting the pieces together and getting to the bottom of what's really going on.
If the internet were down, everyone would have to witness the event without being able to share/discuss it with a global mind... and once the internet came back up, the USEFUL information about the incident would be A LOT LESS, and the sensationalized info would far outweigh it.
24 hours after events, the discussion usually becomes pretty useless... the first 24 hours is when the most useful, truthful, non-sensationalized info is distributed/discussed.
Just some thoughts.
