07-26-2019, 05:23 PM
Yeah, they pretend to care about life, but they really don't.
I've heard a lot of arguments against the death penalty.
I think killing people via the electric chair is inexcusable for reasons that have nothing to do with caring about people, LOL...
http://www.sectual.com/thread-14415.html
But I think the worst part about the death penalty is that they keep people sitting around for years eating up tax payer money before they kill 'em.
If you're a child molester/rapist, firing squad. Serial killer? Firing squad. As far as regular murderers and whatnot, it depends... if you tortured innocent people before killing them, firing squad.
But it becomes complicated in a lot of cases...
Say for example the Gypsy Blanchard case were her mom was forcing her to pretend to be handicapped/wheelchair bound, and Gypsy met a dude over the internet and eventually talked him into killing her mom.
I discussed the case starting here: http://www.sectual.com/thread-11154-post...l#pid94936
Gypsy got 10 years, and the guy got life without parole... well I think they both should have gotten a max of 10 years.
It's a case by case kinda thing and it all revolves around common sense...
Did the person who got killed "have it coming" and if so, do we really wanna lock up whoever killed them and did this world a favor by taking them out?
It would be nice if it was still the old west and "he needed killing" was a good enough explanation...
http://www.thehistoryreader.com/modern-h...dodge_city
Things have just gotten too complicated and when things get too complicated, people suffer.
I've heard a lot of arguments against the death penalty.
I think killing people via the electric chair is inexcusable for reasons that have nothing to do with caring about people, LOL...
http://www.sectual.com/thread-14415.html
But I think the worst part about the death penalty is that they keep people sitting around for years eating up tax payer money before they kill 'em.
If you're a child molester/rapist, firing squad. Serial killer? Firing squad. As far as regular murderers and whatnot, it depends... if you tortured innocent people before killing them, firing squad.
But it becomes complicated in a lot of cases...
Say for example the Gypsy Blanchard case were her mom was forcing her to pretend to be handicapped/wheelchair bound, and Gypsy met a dude over the internet and eventually talked him into killing her mom.
I discussed the case starting here: http://www.sectual.com/thread-11154-post...l#pid94936
Gypsy got 10 years, and the guy got life without parole... well I think they both should have gotten a max of 10 years.
It's a case by case kinda thing and it all revolves around common sense...
Did the person who got killed "have it coming" and if so, do we really wanna lock up whoever killed them and did this world a favor by taking them out?
It would be nice if it was still the old west and "he needed killing" was a good enough explanation...
http://www.thehistoryreader.com/modern-h...dodge_city
Things have just gotten too complicated and when things get too complicated, people suffer.
