SECTUAL

Full Version: Anybody else thinking we should've had a moon base and put a man on Mars by now?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Never mind flying cars and hoverboards. I'm talking about stuff we've had the technology to do for 50 years or more. Just think how much better the snowflake generation's outlook would be if, instead of larping around in black masks and rotting their brains with cell phones, they were exploring strange new worlds, and like that.

http://www.sectual.com/thread-472.html

(01-28-2017, 08:06 PM)Trix Wrote: [ -> ]Interstellar travel is not possible because different stars emit entirely different particles. Beyond the magnetic field of a system's own star, there's nothing but dead space. The star system is like a bubble, and everything inside is powered by the particles of the sun. Different star systems' particles are incompatible.

Likewise, in every planet is a core that can essentially be thought of as a miniature sun. That's what it is. It's a tiny piece of sun. It has its own magnetic field, the earth's magnetosphere for example. The lifeforms which come to exist on each heavenly body do so with the elements present in the point at which they reside. For example, today's human is a surface creature, it's come to exist on the surface. The relationship with the surface and the sun, the relationship with the surface and all the surrounding elements. These relationships are precise in what they form. Humans can't exist up in the sky because the air gets too thin, they can't exist deep in the earth because it's too hot. They're lifeforms equipped for surface existence.

Therefore, they are not equipped to live in space. The farther away from their native position in the earth's magnetic field (and also the relation between that field and the sun's magnetic field), the harder it is for them to survive. There are so many threats to them in space. There's no surviving without machinery and special materials, and these materials and machines are ultimately fragile, doomed to fail because of the severity of conditions in space and on other planets.

Where humans cannot live naturally... they will not live. They will stagnate and decay, whether they "survive" for any period of time or not.

(01-29-2017, 12:45 PM)Trix Wrote: [ -> ]People with no family to speak of, no kids etc are great candidates for off world colonization. It's a pointless death mission though. Humans need to fix the problems on earth instead of just running away. Wanting to colonize space when we don't even know what's at the depths of our own oceans is the perfect example of that human greed which always leads to disaster.

(03-21-2017, 12:51 PM)Trix Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-21-2017, 11:18 AM)Trix Wrote: [ -> ]Here's an interesting article describing what it feels like to be in space: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...feel-awful

The description of feeling like you're falling backward when you put your head forward because of inner ear fluid...

It just gives such a good example of how out of synch and totally misplaced humanity is in space.

If you think about this view of the solar system...




It's so easy to see how an out of place element, like humans in space, is out of synch with the entire process. That kind of imbalance won't be tolerated. The only reason manned missions have been successful is because they're small scale. A couple humans, whatever. It's skirting the edge, it's not enough to cause a serious adjustment. The more they do it though, the more necessary an adjustment will become. Adjustments are fast too, I would guess space debris/meteors would be the tools. Kind of in line with my theory about asteroids being almost 'magnetically' drawn to impact the earth when things get too far out of balance on the planet.

Just sayin'...

Book
I mean you can stagnate and decay doing something exciting, or you can stagnate and decay playing Pokemon Go. shrug
Hey, if you guys wanna go out there and do that, go ahead. But I'll tell you what you ain't fucking taking with you...

(03-11-2017, 03:34 PM)Trix Wrote: [ -> ]I think they should send BASICALLY EVERYONE to Mars (LOL and that's pretty funny knowing what I think about life on other planets/in space being unsustainable)...

EXCEPT for the geniuses (and really really good looking people) whose sperm are in the bank, and the women who want to have their babies.

And the world should be repopulated with ONLY the babies of the geniuses (and really really good looking people).

The geniuses could do world tours and talk to the masses of their babies in arenas. They could do mass meet and greets. They could broadcast to them on the internet.

All the TV would just be about all the geniuses so the babies and kids could learn about their genius dads and how to be smart too. Kinda like the NASA channel, only about the genius sperm donors.

I know the elite wanna do this the other way around... they want to leave all the masses behind on earth and then go populate Mars with genius babies. Unfortunately they're pure and total fucking idiots for wanting to do that because it would be a waste of genius sperm and babies once the infrastructure on Mars fails and literally everyone who went there dies (inevitable).

It's stupid to try and "escape" earth. Set up DEEP underground dwellings so we can survive on our own fucking planet where it's ACTUALLY possible. Do it here on earth... populate the earth with the children of geniuses (and really really good looking people).

http://www.sectual.com/thread-1036.html
In other words, I should do a search before I post.
Absolutely not...

But rather than try to conjure up all my opinions into a cohesive post, I merely go back in the DB and retrieve the data from other times I've talked about the same topic.

It's efficient.
There's no living on other planets as a human.

This is the human planet.

And if it ever does happen, it won't last.
It'll also be a waste of time.

Should we really 'do it' just to say we 'did it'?

When they get wiped out up there on Mars, it'll leave a bad taste in everyone's mouth anyway...

And when life in the solar system gets wiped out in general, it'll be forgotten anyway.

Humans wanting to live on other planets before they've even explored the depths of their own planet is akin to women not being in the kitchen.

Guest

Guys, guys... Humans have already been to Mars. Among many other individual testimonies of human Mars colonization, the testimony of Andrew Basiago has alleged that the US and other gov't's have had teleportation programs which have sent people to Mars since at least the early 1980's. Until now, about 7 people have corroborated the account of Basiago, among those including: Bernard Mendez and William Stillings, who are direct eyewitnesses of his account, and Laura Eisenhower, who is an independent corroborator. Interestingly, Laura Eisenhower, being an independent corroborator, has stated that she was recruited to go to Mars in 2006, and had subsequently refused to go, and was told that the method of travel she would use to go to Mars was called, "ARC". Laura, not knowing what that named meant, attributed it to Noah's Ark, but it was elucidated by Basiago that "ARC" was an acronym for Aeronautical Repositioning Chamber - gathered from what I assume was from his experience in US Mars "jump-room" (teleportation) program. And yes, Laura Eisenhower is the great-granduaghter of Dwight D. Eisenhower. lol

This video shows Basiago and Stillings explaining their findings of their experiences:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnSbPVIrOas

This one is a clearer account of Basiago's experiences:
https://youtu.be/7iNoUs9neSA?t=2m4s

And, lastly, this is an interview of Laura Eisenhower talking about her recruitment to go live on Mars:
https://youtu.be/4IF_sDVzlYw?t=1m11s
Another vid: https://youtu.be/em2Mxoqkjlc?t=7s (the video makes it seem that Mars One is related to her experiences, but it wasn't)
I think the only way humans go out into space to colonize shit is if the entire industrial world gets together and build huge ass colony ships capable of taking tens of thousands of people. Of course you need to be able to live on said ships for thousands of years to reach habitable planets. I don´t think we´re going to find out how to bend space and make worm holes any time soon.

Also I think gravity on planets like mars will fuck people up big time. A lot of things in our bodies are finely tuned for Earths gravity, like our sense of balance in the inner ear.
(11-26-2017, 06:22 AM) Wrote: [ -> ]Interestingly, Laura Eisenhower, being an independent corroborator, has stated that she was recruited to go to Mars in 2006, and had subsequently refused to go, and was told that the method of travel she would use to go to Mars was called, "ARC". Laura, not knowing what that named meant, attributed it to Noah's Ark, but it was elucidated by Basiago that "ARC" was an acronym for Aeronautical Repositioning Chamber - gathered from what I assume was from his experience in US Mars "jump-room" (teleportation) program. And yes, Laura Eisenhower is the great-granduaghter of Dwight D. Eisenhower. lol

The way I’ve always felt about this is, just because she’s Eisenhower’s great-granddaughter doesn’t mean she ain’t crazy as hell.

It doesn’t mean she has any credibility.

I’m sorry it’s just...

Even if they are teleporting to Mars, those of us who aren’t are basically living in an entirely different reality from those people, it may as well be another planet entirely... indeed.

I am occupying the reality where common sense says space colonization goes against nature, therefore is futile and doomed.

Guest

OMG we need to get busy figuring out how to make humans live 600 years all space money should be redirected to elongation of human lives either that or a giant solid gold statue of trix holding a dildo
I don’t believe in dildos...

http://www.sectual.com/thread-793.html

Guest

(11-26-2017, 01:40 PM)Trix Wrote: [ -> ]The way I’ve always felt about this is, just because she’s Eisenhower’s great-granddaughter doesn’t mean she ain’t crazy as hell.

It doesn’t mean she has any credibility.

I’m sorry it’s just...

Even if they are teleporting to Mars, those of us who aren’t are basically living in an entirely different reality from those people, it may as well be another planet entirely... indeed.

I am occupying the reality where common sense says space colonization goes against nature, therefore is futile and doomed.

Well, I find it interesting that no one, not even her family, has refuted her claims or called her "crazy". In fact, Laura claims that her family has been supportive of her life mission(s), including disclosing her Mars recruitment experiences. Furthermore, Basiago and others have publicly recalled working and having detailed conversations with Mary Jean Eisenhower, Laura's aunt, in the Mars "jump-room" program Basiago was in. Mary Jean has not publicly denied these claims, or confirmed them, but that would make sense since she is a well-known public figure for other reasons.
I've listened to several interviews with Laura over the years...

Some of the things she said, which had nothing to do with the Mars thing, led me to believe that she could be totally nuts.

As for why her family hasn't come out and called her crazy in front of everyone... why would they unless she was an asshole to them? They probably love her, and her crazy isn't hurting anyone so there's no real need to throw her under the bus by coming out and calling her crazy.

Besides, think about it...

If what she's saying isn't true, they probably think she is completely insane, and considering the subject matter, they probably just assume anyone who hears about it is going to think she's nuts too, therefore there's no reason to address it.

And if what she's saying is true, they probably want people to assume she's merely a crazy person, and that takes care of itself... there is no reason for them to affirm or deny.