(10-29-2020, 11:38 AM)Dev Wrote: Being a billionaire kinda insulates him from the wall though, as that's what most women want.

Nope...

Women want attractive offspring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_son_hypothesis and they don't care if it's from a wealthy man or not.

After they get their attractive offspring, then they want the wealthy man (resources for the offspring).

https://imgur.com/a/PecZYsJ

What the utter fuck?

What happened to this guy??

Is that even really the same dude??

This shit is blowing my mind right now.

I mean...

Somebody who looks like that prooooobably can't make good choices.

(10-29-2020, 12:36 PM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Women want attractive offspring....

Right. He was a handsome man before he let himself go.

He probably won't sire any offspring looking like that, but a woman who has had her kids will settle down with him for security in exchange for throwing him a fuck once a month.

(10-29-2020, 01:02 PM)Dev Wrote: ... a woman who has had her kids will settle down with him for security in exchange for throwing him a fuck once a month.

And being a blue pill beta, he'll probably consider that a fair exchange until he gets ass-raped in divorce court.

(10-29-2020, 12:53 PM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Somebody who looks like that prooooobably can't make good choices.

If he has a lick of sense, he'll never marry or shack up. Renting a call girl once a month would be a hell of a lot cheaper.

The sexy son hypothesis would certainly apply to animals that are in tune with nature. Especially in species such as birds, where being beautiful is directly related to attracting a female. In mammals, the emphasis seems to be more on finding a brutish male who can protect the female and her offspring. An ape who kicks all of the other apes' asses gets all the females, for example.

Modern human females are a unique category. In many cases, feminist indoctrination has suppressed their natural maternal instincts. The fact that they postpone childbearing in favor of an education and career indicates dissonant priorities. In most species, motherhood is the female's first priority. In humans, it's often an afterthought.

Also, note that a hypothesis isn't proven science, nor even a theory. It's just an idea or assertion that needs to be tested.

(10-29-2020, 11:17 AM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Steve Jobs wore the same thing every single day.

Of course he had multiple pairs of the pants and shirts.

That'd be me, holmes.

Black t-shirt. Faded blue jeans. Leather sandals. Baseball cap.

But I'd have 20 shirts, 10 pairs of jeans [literally a lifetime supply! lol] 
5 pairs of comfy sandals and... uh... uuuh...

50 Texas Longhorn baseball caps. *ahem* Stop looking at me, I'm not weird. It's normal. Completely normal I say!

(10-29-2020, 01:13 PM)Dev Wrote: Renting a call girl once a month would be a hell of a lot cheaper.

Not in heart-dollars. And that's the currency that counts. ; )

(10-29-2020, 01:02 PM)Dev Wrote: He probably won't sire any offspring looking like that, but a woman who has had her kids will settle down with him for security in exchange for throwing him a fuck once a month.

Lol, agh... the painful truth.

(10-29-2020, 01:13 PM)Dev Wrote: If he has a lick of sense, he'll never marry or shack up. Renting a call girl once a month would be a hell of a lot cheaper.

Yeah, I would recommend that he takes however long he needs to in order to sort out whatever problems he's having... cuz he's definitely having them.

He can marry when he's over 50, and over it in general.

(10-29-2020, 01:31 PM)Dev Wrote: The sexy son hypothesis would certainly apply to animals that are in tune with nature. Especially in species such as birds, where being beautiful is directly related to attracting a female. In mammals, the emphasis seems to be more on finding a brutish male who can protect the female and her offspring. An ape who kicks all of the other apes' asses gets all the females, for example.

Modern human females are a unique category. In many cases, feminist indoctrination has suppressed their natural maternal instincts. The fact that they postpone childbearing in favor of an education and career indicates dissonant priorities. In most species, motherhood is the female's first priority. In humans, it's often an afterthought.

Also, note that a hypothesis isn't proven science, nor even a theory. It's just an idea or assertion that needs to be tested.

Well, myself for example, I would have a child with a man who was genius level intelligence but not necessarily good looking...

https://www.sectual.com/thread-1036.html

I have discussed that in depth.

I hold intelligence above all.

That said, I link to the "Sexy Son Hypothesis" for a reason...

I believe it is absolutely true.

(10-29-2020, 01:49 PM)somethingelseishere Wrote: Not in heart-dollars. And that's the currency that counts. ; )

Nine times out of ten, a woman who marries an unattractive billionaire ain't doing it for love.

(10-29-2020, 01:50 PM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Well, myself for example, I would have a child with a man who was genius level intelligence but not necessarily good looking...

Are you planning to have kids? If not, it's all academic.

(10-29-2020, 01:51 PM)Dev Wrote: Nine times out of ten, a woman who marries an unattractive billionaire ain't doing it for love.

I guess we'll just have to file that one under "sad but true".  : (

(10-29-2020, 02:02 PM)somethingelseishere Wrote: I guess we'll just have to file that one under "sad but true".  : (

Hammer time!

(10-29-2020, 01:53 PM)Dev Wrote: Are you planning to have kids? If not, it's all academic.

Hon, I do not understand this. What does this mean?

(10-29-2020, 02:14 PM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Hon, I do not understand this. What does this mean?

I don't think you can predict who will be the father of your first child if you're not actively working towards that particular set of circumstances. If it's in the distant future, it's the kind of thing you'll change your mind about several times before it actually happens. The "type" you want today may be quite different from the type you'll want in a few years. Hope that makes sense.

I'll put it in a somewhat more crude way.

In my country, we have saying:

"Women make rules for betas.
Women break rules for alphas."

When you look at women's dating profiles, they invariably have a long list of expectations. Good-looking, confident, financially stable, sense of humor, non-smoker, or whatever.

They'll enforce those rules for a beta, but...

... along comes an alpha who makes their panties wet, and every single one of those rules goes out the window. They're immediately down to fuck, and damn the consequences.

What this means is, unless you have a much higher than average capacity for self-restraint, you have a better chance of getting pregnant by that alpha than by a guy who meets all of your well thought out expectations.

(10-29-2020, 02:09 PM)Dev Wrote: Hammer time!

One of my faves!