Every 3 months or so...
i have to look through.. add apps. in chrome of firefox- to prevent them stupid youtube ads interupting me
while im trying to TECHNO hardcore...
and it gets interupted becuase
YOUTUBE... keeps switching there Ad's system and I have to enable new blockers

They just dont want me enjoying Free From Ad's
Thats Right
They want to zombiefy me with Ad's
This is why I dont own Television

I dont want to give another minute to fake news.
I really dont.
This some Orwellian shit saying
WATCH MY ADS BITCH
WATCH IT NOW
I COMMAND YOU

Dont you Dare Ad them Blockers there saying. Will Keep Changing it over and over...
Just Cant win...
=Dark Age Mentallity

I've never had to change my ad blocker in Firefox. Just install uBlock Origin.

I still just use AdBlock.

obviously me too
but on chrome they change these things over and over and rinse repeat need new extentions

like what do they want out of me with these ads more gillette commercials... What am i not male feminist enough?

The AdBlock developers make deals with advertisers to whitelist some ads.

uBlock Origin blocks all ads, period. That's the whole point of using an ad blocker.

thanks for tip guest. I know every so often in chrome firefox i need to change the adblocker

The main problem I have with Firefox is memory leaks. It apparently doesn't release memory back to the system when I close tabs. Sometimes it eventually consumes all of the system RAM on my laptop and I have to kill it from the task list.

Wow! So thats whats causing it!
My god. I usually leave my laptop on and Firefox starts acting all jumanji on me
this explains alooot
ty.

(02-22-2019, 11:59 PM)Guest Wrote: starts acting all jumanji on me

Lolol.

(02-22-2019, 07:59 PM)real_deal Wrote: while im trying to TECHNO hardcore

Lmfaolol.

(02-22-2019, 11:59 PM)Guest Wrote: Wow! So thats whats causing it!
My god. I usually leave my laptop on and Firefox starts acting all jumanji on me
this explains alooot
ty.

Most programmers take great pains to prevent memory leaks in their software, so I feel that this is a sign of sloppy design or implementation on Mozilla's part.