From the Donald's IG:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2Qapv6Bc7v

This either means he skips this next cycle, or another Trump is elected in 2024...

It's certainly not without meaning

4 Days Ago > September 11th

I mean we always said Ivanka 2024...

But that was before Ivanka revealed herself as a bleeding heart fucking nightmare.

So it would have to be Donald Jr. because he's hot.

I mean Donald Jr. is hot as FUCKKKK.

Let's face it, Donald Jr. is more likable than Donald Sr. anyway...

I bet he'll roll out some serious shit to get elected in 2024.

Yeah, Ivanka is the caboose of the Trump Train.

(09-15-2019, 12:37 PM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Let's face it, Donald Jr. is more likable than Donald Sr. anyway...

I just mean more GENERALLY likable...

I dig Donald Sr.'s personality and I think he's fucking hilarious, but...

Donald Jr. appeals to more people.

(09-15-2019, 03:19 PM)Mister Obvious Wrote: Donald Jr. appeals to more people.

I'm curious how having Kush as his VP would effect the ticket. The number of times and ways Kush has proven himself have been manifold, and he has the Merlin-like prowess you want in a solid VP, but is it too much outsider power? DTJ might need his own version of Pence. 

I agree that DTJ > Ivanka as a choice, but I still think Ivanka could run, bleeding heart or no. There's never been a husband/wife ticket before, I'm sure for very good reason. It's legal but not politically viable, generally. However, there's never been a woman in Ivanka's position, and certainly not with a husband like Kush, so, in this context it could at least be interesting. It would feel more British; more like royalty.

OP takes on a new meaning now eh.

(09-15-2019, 11:29 AM)Mister Obvious Wrote: It's certainly not without meaning

I bet your mind assigns meaning to a wisp of wind coming from the right instead of the left
after you ask yourself a binary question. Probably assign meanings within meanings as well. 

You're very meaningful. full of meaning. Sometimes fully mean.

There are a lot of ways your statements can be interpreted, but they just sound rude.

Say a bunch of rude things and then say one nice thing...

Who does that work on?

(11-09-2020, 10:50 AM)Mister Obvious Wrote: There are a lot of ways your statements can be interpreted, but they just sound rude.

Say a bunch of rude things and then say one nice thing...

Who does that work on?

Let me be clear so there's no room for interpretation which may "sound rude."

I was saying you have a big imagination, very creative thinking. 

Thinking which can become complex. 

Now for the nice thing at the end. Reread this truthful compliment.

Okay, I believe you.