Disclosure & Attention Diversion: What are we missing, and what is the real story?
(09-09-2025, 09:56 AM)Luscious Atanari Wrote: NOBODY NEEDS TO SEE ANY MORE OF THAT FUCKING TRASH. 

It's long past the "sick joke" phase. 

Agreed, I'm over it. And it's probably on purpose.

They want to give us bullshit fatigue with this lameass footage.

It's a psychological operation from start to finish...

I bet every step is carefully calculated.

Maybe they think it'll be easier for the masses to digest if they start out with the shittiest footage ever.

By the time they start releasing the crystal clear shit, we'll all be dead.

I guess we're lucky to know at this early stage that it's their own tech and they're just making this shit up.

(09-09-2025, 10:06 AM)Luscious Atanari Wrote: Bob Lazar is the only rock star in this entire saga.

Yup, damn straight. Anyone else who is legit at all has been buried under the bigger names who are all controlled.
Reply
Well, I may have spoken too soon. That hellfire missile video is probably the single most incredible piece of UFO footage I’ve ever seen. You can clearly see the missile hit the UFO, and the UFO just kind of bubbles a little bit and then it collects all the pieces of the missiles around it, and the pieces and debris continue to fly with the UFO. That shit is crazy. This is definitely some kind of step. I’ll come back with a timestamp.

1:50 The congressman sets up the video:

Reply
Later, everyone was asked whether or not they were scared by the fact that this object got hit by a fucking hellfire missile and just kept flying like nothing had happened after bobbling around for a bit, and the entire panel said “yes” (with the exception of George Knapp, who already knew about the video in theory, and said he was too happy that they released this to the public to be scared).
Reply
I mean, it’s a hellfire missile, and it hit the thing dead on, and the debris of the missile ended up caught in its wake somehow, which I think implies gravity propulsion, and the thing just kept rolling on over the ocean after doing a little dance…

What The Fuck
Reply
This is what it reminds me of...

[Mercury Droplets]


Reply
Look at the different shapes it forms depending on the frequency...



I'm not saying the UFOs are made of mercury but...

What the hell kind of material can take a hellfire missile and then pull its own (MINIMAL) debris behind it in some kind of force field?

That video is probably the most compelling I've seen yet and they said it was from 2024...

About 20 years newer than the other shit they show us.
Reply
The way the debris followed is the most shocking part.

It's like it was designed to bring every part of the machine back with itself in case it was ever attacked, so no one would get any piece of it.

I dunno how else to say it.

What are the implications of that?
Reply
If you were a country with advanced tech, you might build something that would have safeguards in place in case it gets attacked, just so the enemy can't get hold of it for back engineering.
Reply
My impression was, the machine itself was completely unscathed, and the pieces were of the missile in the debris state, post impact.

(All the edits because I’m using voice recognition on a phone. Not ideal for BB)
Reply
Did you read the comments on that video?? I've never seen a more divided comment section.

The idea that they're just shooting their new tech with their old tech to test it out seems solid though.
Reply
(09-09-2025, 07:47 PM)Luscious Atanari Wrote: My impression was, the machine itself was completely unscathed, and the pieces were the missile itself in the debris state, post impact.

I think you're right. I think the debris IS the missile.

Maybe it wasn't purposely hauling anything back and just caught in a gravity field like you said.
Reply
What then, is this a UFO with antigravity shielding or something??

Or is being missile-proof just a byproduct of HOW it functions??
Reply
Whatever the fuck it is, there's no winning against it... not with anything the public has been allowed to know about.
Reply
If we have that in our arsenal, we win. However, I don’t know that we would declassify it if that was the case? It’s a great thought though.
Reply
Is the UFO itself the bigger shape throughout the footage and the smaller ones are the missile debris??

It looks like the impact ripples through it like it's liquid or something.

Am I looking at the wrong thing??
Reply
The fact that I even have to ask drives the earlier point about film quality home though, I'm just saying.
Reply
What the hell is the size of this thing? Why don't they ever give us these details?
Reply


Comment Wrote:Nice to see 1970's drunk Orson Wells was able to come back to do this interview.

Fucking lol.

Judging by the comments, most people hated this interview and thought the interviewer sucked. Not surprised since it's from VICE.

The comments are either hilarious, or cool stories about UFO sightings dating back like 70 years...

Exact same UFOs that we hear people describe seeing today.

What the fuck, man.

Comment Wrote:David Grusch isn't a whistle blower. Whistle blowers don't say things like, "I'm not allowed to say that" or "I can tell you in a closed meeting"

Ain't that the damn truth.
Reply
11:30 this "orb" looks like liquid too.
Reply
(09-09-2025, 07:50 PM)Mister Obvious Wrote: What then, is this a UFO with antigravity shielding or something??

Or is being missile-proof just a byproduct of HOW it functions??

If we accept them as completely ignoring the physics of water and air and outer space—the capacity to move through them seamlessly, then it’s possible that they might be less affected by high impact objects within those elements. 

It was knocked off its straight-line path and it wobbled a bit, and then it went into a curved path, so it was clearly affected, and I think that data is probably very relevant. The fact that it was knocked off course indicates the capacity to affect the technology. I can’t help but wonder what would’ve happened if a second missile hit as it was wobbling.

If it’s ours, then I guess we are in the midst of testing, but if it’s not, then it’s a damn good thing that we’re sending drones instead of humans.
Reply


Please note that new posts in this forum must be approved by a moderator before becoming visible.
[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)












Disclaimer | Terms Of Service | Privacy Policy