03-04-2018, 11:42 PM
(03-04-2018, 11:23 PM)Trix Wrote: The only thing I agree with in any of that is the concept that legal action may not be successful ONLY because the courts are undoubtedly corrupt.
Well I mean, yeah, ideally they probably do have a case..... Regarding censorship and the like... But I'm pretty sure Youtube can come up with many reasons for banning Infowars due to the content they make... And I'm pretty sure that's what they're doing.
Though, IMO, yeah sure the courts may be corrupt, but I think that the sheep-like mindset of the public in general, and Youtube's policies, would keep Alex Jones from being protected either way. I think "offensive" content can be taken and used in many ways........ I feel Youtube knows how to leverage the generality of their policies against it's user base in legal situations and always win...
I mean what court is going to protect a Youtube channel saying that the Sandy Hook, Las vegas, or Florida High School mass shootings where government hoaxes and no one died? For some reason that's offensive to people. That, btw, is why I think "underground" platforms are a good next step.
