Posts: 79,943
Threads: 4,855
Joined: May 2016
08-10-2023, 06:17 PM
Synchronicity can be perplexing sometimes, hard to discern the meaning of the message.
To understand the signs, you have to be mindful of what you're thinking about on a regular basis...
You have to consider the situation that was taking place just before the moment of synchronicity.
The answer to what each synchronicity means lies within your thoughts and/or actions at the time.
Posts: 79,943
Threads: 4,855
Joined: May 2016
If you experience a synchronicity but you don't know what it means, take it as a sign to practice mindfulness.
More synchs will happen related to the issue, and eventually you'll understand what it means.
MrFuckaratis
Unregistered
08-13-2023, 10:33 PM
I had a dream last night about this girl I went to school with.
Why? I found her FB I can't message or ad her and I don't want to.
But why her? Its odd.
Posts: 5,282
Threads: 32
Joined: May 2017
I've had some pretty cool synch's lately. Always gives me a glimmer of hope that
the Universe hasn't forgotten about me. : )
Posts: 79,943
Threads: 4,855
Joined: May 2016
I had an interesting one yesterday... it was a double synchronicity. One like 3 seconds apart from the other.
If one could do the math on such a thing, it'd be interesting to know what the probabilities of these synchs really are.
People say math is the language of the universe, but I think it's synchronicity, which is a step beyond.
Posts: 79,943
Threads: 4,855
Joined: May 2016
"Disclosure & Attention Diversion: What are we missing, and what is the real story?"
https://www.sectual.com/thread-17936-pos...#pid178629
(08-30-2023, 04:44 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: So the most intense synchronicity that I have ever experienced in my entire life, the one with the most astronomical odds that make it legitimately impossible to have even happened... took place on this very site.
Specifically, it took place surrounding this post:
https://www.sectual.com/post-68353.html#pid68353
Also quoted earlier on this thread:
https://www.sectual.com/thread-17936-pos...#pid169644
It's a 2018 post...
Back in June, I was watching the Tom DeLonge/Rogan interview which I had never heard before, whilst reading back over that 2018 post...
As I was reading it...
Tom DeLonge spoke, verbatim, the exact words in a sentence that I was reading at that exact second.
I couldn't fucking believe it.
I paused the video, backed it up to make sure I had heard it properly... and just stood in silence for a few minutes, totally tripping balls over what had just happened.
At that moment, I was certain that we live in a code-based (ones and zeros) simulation and that it was NECESSARY (for some reason) for me to know this, for CERTAIN.
I've experienced a lot of synchs in my time, and some of them had similarly impressive seemingly impossible odds.
But this was the most intense of all of them.
There were "echoes" before this unbelievably huge synch too...
For MONTHS beforehand, with exact words being read on this site WHILST I heard them being spoken by someone in a video at the same time.
There were echoes and ripples for months afterward as well, of the same nature.
So...
It was a singularity.
Beyond showing me that there's a slim to none chance that this ISN'T a simulation...
I don't necessarily know what it meant.
Could it mean the info presented by Tom, or his frontman position in this weird disclosure era is significant? Maybe. Could mean a lot of things.
But I know for sure what it meant to me on a personal level.
The really cool thing about digital synchronicities is that you can record a snapshot of them...
https://i.imgur.com/d9g3P5j.png
Here's the link to the Rogan interview on Spotify...
https://open.spotify.com/episode/2ybsXdWAtxqLBdRByLb2YG
Go to the timestamp shown in the screencap and verify for yourself that he says those exact words.
I would like for someone to figure out a way to calculate the odds.
I dunno if that is even possible...
But I think we need to start finding a way to mathematically calculate the odds of synchronicities.
They are the language of the universe and I think it's paramount to understand them...
That is the only reason I am sharing this.
Any computer scientist mathematical genius brainiacs wanna take this on??
I think somebody really needs to.
You know it's already being studied and attempted with super computers and AI.
We need public knowledge on this, regular people who are able to calculate things like this and share their findings freely with the world.
Posts: 79,943
Threads: 4,855
Joined: May 2016
We're living breathing algorithms...
We're programmed.
We run in consciousness loops.
I've talked about this before, some peoples' consciousness loops are longer than others'...
https://www.sectual.com/thread-16682-pos...#pid114558
https://www.sectual.com/thread-11880-pos...l#pid84710
It is not a very remarkable notion that we are going to experience synchronicities based on our programming, our personal databases of knowledge/info/language...
That is only to be expected if indeed we live in a binary code based simulation.
What I'm fascinated by is the seeming "language" characteristics of synchronicity.
If there is a way to calculate the odds, we can quite literally crack the code of the universe MATHEMATICALLY.
It isn't NECESSARY for us to do this, it would just be another layer/level in the game.
But I believe it would be extremely positive for humanity to realize this secret hidden in plain sight and I believe it would instantly transmute us into more advanced and evolved beings.
Posts: 79,943
Threads: 4,855
Joined: May 2016
(08-30-2023, 04:46 PM)Chatwoman Wrote: So the most intense synchronicity that I have ever experienced in my entire life, the one with the most astronomical odds that make it legitimately impossible to have even happened...
At least I assume the odds are astronomical and may as well be considered impossible.
However, I have no way of knowing this for sure.
I don't know the formula that would need to be used in order to calculate such odds.
It is my hope that someday, someone who DOES have these capabilities will figure this out...
Someone who is trustworthy, and WILL share their findings publicly with no restrictions or bias.
Posts: 3,886
Threads: 6
Joined: Apr 2017