It's a waste of time.

[user94]

>No actually that is being a slimy cunt like a used car salesman, if you cant tell the truth then don't fucking speak you slimy worm.

if you can't recognize the truth, it matters not what anyone says or how they say it.

>Seeking satisfaction in one's own accomplishments is "external" validation? You'll have explain that one, brother.


yes. were you not immediately satisfied upon taking a particular action? you must not have been if you're still seeking it. what is it you're actually seeking?

>Cryptic communication is obnoxious...

i'm familiar with your thoughts on this, and i agree to the extent of people being cryptic for the sake of being cryptic, or just to mess with people. there's a utility to it though.

we can go to many places on the internet or in person, and tell people for instance that the parkland shooting was a staged operation in very simple terms. for people that are already familiar with such things, they already know and agree. for the ignorant, you've just committed heresy. you cannot speak plain truths to the stupid or ignorant. it doesn't even always work to speak plain truths to the intelligent. they can acquire the knowledge part, but without the wisdom that knowledge is wasted.

i've experienced this myself in a personal capacity, and witnessed it in many many others. i've got 15+ years of management experience. i've tried many things over the years with my various staff members, and people in my personal life. you cannot force something to `click` internally in another individual, but you can set the stage for it. many people love mysteries. it's much more satisfying to reach a conclusion on your own than be forcefed that conclusion. it's more fun to do a connect-the-dots picture rather than tracing someone else's work.

What a slimy lying cunt ey lol

[Guest]

were you not immediately satisfied upon taking a particular action?

Would I know whether or not I was satisfied, if I didn't consider it before jumping directly into the next action?

Do: Think and act. Observe, consider, and respond.

Do not: Act and react and act and react and act and react....

The former is what reasoning people do.

The latter is what people who allow other people and events to drive their actions do. They may as well be marionettes.

[Guest]

tell people for instance that the parkland shooting was a staged operation in very simple terms. for people that are already familiar with such things, they already know and agree. for the ignorant, you've just committed heresy.

If I told someone that out of the blue, I'd expect them to be skeptical and demand proof. If they took my word for it, I'd consider them to be very gullible.

[user94]

If I told someone that out of the blue, I'd expect them to be skeptical and demand proof. If they took my word for it, I'd consider them to be very gullible.

[zenba]

>Would I know whether or not I was satisfied, if I didn't consider it before jumping directly into the next action?

yes, unless you were relying on external forces to validate it. you're either satisfied or not with your own doings regardless of others. if your doings met your own internal standards, you should be satisfied. it's quite good to refine your own standards, but at a given point in time you can only work with what you have.

i get into a lot of `arguments/debates` with people. i don't argue to change the mind of the individual i'm debating. i speak my views so that they have been spoken. other people listening/reading can take whatever they want from it. i'm satisfied with that, but it seems you are not.

>If I told someone that out of the blue, I'd expect them to be skeptical and demand proof. If they took my word for it, I'd consider them to be very gullible.

that's the thing, they aren't even skeptical of anything beyond their indoctrination. they don't ask for proof or reasoning. they just attack you, like a bored aussie in the afternoon. despite all these so called `liberals` infesting various spaces, open mindedness is becoming very scarce.

and that's my point. plain truths either fit within the existing framework of one's mind or they don't. they're either accepted or mocked. it's the societally conditioned True/False dichotomy. it is possible to get around this dichotomy when the information is posed in the style of a poem / riddle.

[user94]

>Would I know whether or not I was satisfied, if I didn't consider it before jumping directly into the next action?

yes, unless you were relying on external forces to validate it. you're either satisfied or not with your own doings regardless of others. if your doings met your own internal standards, you should be satisfied. it's quite good to refine your own standards, but at a given point in time you can only work with what you have.

i get into a lot of `arguments/debates` with people. i don't argue to change the mind of the individual i'm debating. i speak my views so that they have been spoken. other people listening/reading can take whatever they want from it. i'm satisfied with that, but it seems you are not.

>If I told someone that out of the blue, I'd expect them to be skeptical and demand proof. If they took my word for it, I'd consider them to be very gullible.

that's the thing, they aren't even skeptical of anything beyond their indoctrination. they don't ask for proof or reasoning. they just attack you, like a bored aussie in the afternoon. despite all these so called `liberals` infesting various spaces, open mindedness is becoming very scarce.

and that's my point. plain truths either fit within the existing framework of one's mind or they don't. they're either accepted or mocked. it's the societally conditioned True/False dichotomy. it is possible to get around this dichotomy when the information is posed in the style of a poem / riddle.

Stop speaking shit cunt or im gonna have ya!

[zenba]

>Stop speaking shit cunt or im gonna have ya!

i don't swing that way, sailor. i'm as straight as they come.

[Guest]

i speak my views so that they have been spoken. other people listening/reading can take whatever they want from it. i'm satisfied with that, but it seems you are not.

I question people to be sure I've correctly understood what they said. You seem to be saying it's a sign of insecurity to take a moment to savor small triumphs. If that's the case, I disagree. Relishing the occasional reward is what makes the struggle worthwhile. If I've misinterpreted your words somehow, I apologize.

that's the thing, they aren't even skeptical of anything beyond their indoctrination. they don't ask for proof or reasoning. they just attack you

Considering that their indoctrination is likely to be the only information they've been exposed to, that's understandable. I'm not talking about the ideologues whose knee-jerk reaction is to dismiss anything that threatens their sacred cows. Many normal, rational people only hear the mass media spin, never the evidence that researchers on obscure message boards uncover. Not only that, it may be outside the realm of their own experience. False flaggers don't go around announcing that they just perpetrated a false flag. The burden of proof is always on the person making the claim. If you know the reality is different from what society at large is hearing, be prepared to spend time redpilling each and every person you tell it to. If they say something sounds far-fetched, that's because it does.

[user94]

>Stop speaking shit cunt or im gonna have ya!

i don't swing that way, sailor. i'm as straight as they come.

You'll be all bent out of shape when im finished with ye!

[user151]

I deleted my gab account last night. Just like the one before that one. And the one before that one.

It always starts the same way. When you sign up, the welcome wagon dogpiles the fuck out of you. A week later, crickets.

You have no clue if anyone is seeing your posts on Gab unless they like, repost, or reply to them. Yes, you literally have to reply on external validation cues in lieu of engagement stats. Feels like you're talking to yourself for days in a row sometimes, so why bother?

The whole free speech thing is great -- on message boards like this one. There's only one forum, so you're exposed to every poster's viewpoint. Gab, like all of the other social media sites, may as well be a partisan echo chamber. Not just partisan, but single-issue groupthink echo chamber.

[Guest]

The countless man hours spent on research and development by the best technical minds.

The billions of dollars poured into building a colossal infrastructure.

It's all been an absolute waste of time, hasn't it?

Not for the future generations, Herme Trismegistus.
Also when will we build underwater cities!!!