The algorithm has turned against them...

[Dan]

I never found chat gpt's research on a topic as good as my own, really not even close. They would always fail in critical thinking about the topic, and was jumbled without a clear understanding of the topic. They are easy to jailbreak too still, or get off topic.

[Guest]

Chat gpt really lacks any common sense. They never gave me good instructions for the task. Then they would give me some pseudo intellectual summary of what the instructions at the end. I always thought it was pretty garbage. Mediocre.

[Mister Obvious]

What you get back really depends on the quality of the prompt. Just depends on what you're using it for as well.

[Guest]

I disagree. Ive used them for about five years now.

[Mister Obvious]

I believe ya, Dan.

[Guest]

Ivr used them professionally even for five years. Not many people can say that.

[Guest]

I was using these things in very early beta, to present, professionally.

[Mister Obvious]

Okay. I mean, some people like LLMs and some people don't...

It is what it is, Dan. Lmao, you don't have to get so triggered.

[Mister Obvious]

Not many people can say that.

Most "professionals" in the field I've ever heard speak about it don't seem that impressed with LLMs.

Your take is pretty standard.

I'd prefer to talk to other people who are actually excited about it.

[Dan]

Your a fan girl. I'm a professional.

[Dark Dick]

[Dark Dick]